{"id":33845,"date":"2026-04-23T02:01:30","date_gmt":"2026-04-23T02:01:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/web-application-monitoring-best-practices\/"},"modified":"2026-05-16T22:12:38","modified_gmt":"2026-05-16T22:12:38","slug":"web-application-monitoring-best-practices","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/web-application-monitoring-best-practices\/","title":{"rendered":"11 Web Application Monitoring Best Practices (2026)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-33576\" src=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/04\/web-application-monitoring-best-practices.webp\" alt=\"11 Web Application Monitoring Best Practices (2026)\" width=\"480\" height=\"270\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/04\/web-application-monitoring-best-practices.webp 1672w, https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/04\/web-application-monitoring-best-practices-300x169.webp 300w, https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/04\/web-application-monitoring-best-practices-1024x576.webp 1024w, https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/04\/web-application-monitoring-best-practices-768x432.webp 768w, https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/04\/web-application-monitoring-best-practices-1536x864.webp 1536w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 480px) 100vw, 480px\" \/>Global 2000 organizations are facing a financial crisis in digital reliability, now losing a staggering $400 billion every year to system downtime &#8211; a hit that consumes roughly 9% of their total profits [<a href=\"https:\/\/www.splunk.com\/en_us\/newsroom\/press-releases\/2024\/conf24-splunk-report-shows-downtime-costs-global-2000-companies-400-billion-annually.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">1<\/a>]. For large-scale enterprises, the price of a single minute of failure has climbed to $23,750, while the average across all organizations sits at $14,056 [<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bigpanda.io\/blog\/it-outage-costs-2024\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">2<\/a>]. This represents a massive 150% surge from the $5,600 per minute benchmark seen back in 2014 [<a href=\"https:\/\/www.atlassian.com\/incident-management\/kpis\/cost-of-downtime\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">3<\/a>].<\/p>\n<p>The retail and e-commerce sectors are particularly vulnerable, suffering more than any other industry with average annual losses of $287 million per Global 2000 company &#8211; a figure 43.5% higher than the general average [<a href=\"https:\/\/www.splunk.com\/en_us\/newsroom\/press-releases\/2024\/conf24-splunk-report-shows-downtime-costs-global-2000-companies-400-billion-annually.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">4<\/a>]. During high-traffic periods, large retailers can see costs blow past $16,000 per minute. Notable historical failures underscore the risk: in 2018, a transactional failure cost Amazon nearly $99 million [<a href=\"https:\/\/www.axios.com\/2018\/07\/18\/prime-day-woes-might-have-cost-amazon-from-72-99-million\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">5<\/a>], and Meta\u2019s six-hour collapse in 2024 resulted in $100 million in lost revenue [<a href=\"https:\/\/thefinancialexpress.com.bd\/sci-tech\/meta-outage-zuckerberg-loses-around-100-million-in-revenue\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">6<\/a>]. In a landscape where 77% of shoppers will abandon a site immediately after facing a technical error, every second of unavailability is a direct drain on the revenue [<a href=\"https:\/\/queue-it.com\/blog\/cost-of-downtime\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">7<\/a>].<\/p>\n<p>Proactive <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/products\/web-application-monitoring\/\"><strong>web application monitoring<\/strong><\/a> serves as your primary defense against these catastrophic financial leaks by identifying bottlenecks before they escalate into full-scale outages. It reduces incident impact by detecting failures early, shortening mean time to resolution (MTTR), and providing real-time visibility into user-facing errors.<\/p>\n<h2 id='1-set-clear-performance-objectives-slas-slos'  id=\"boomdevs_1\">1. Set Clear Performance Objectives (SLAs &amp; SLOs)<\/h2>\n<p>Effective monitoring requires clear objectives. High-performing teams define Service Level Objectives (SLOs) for internal reliability targets and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for customer commitments. SLOs should be based on user experience metrics and inform incident response thresholds.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Why it is important:<\/strong> Without specific targets, data doesn&#8217;t drive action. Objectives ensure that DevOps and SRE teams are aligned on what &#8220;success&#8221; looks like for the business.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Outcome:<\/strong> Objective data to provide to stakeholders and a clear threshold for when to trigger emergency responses.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Example Use Case:<\/strong> A SaaS provider guarantees 99.9% uptime to enterprise clients. They use external synthetic monitoring to generate objective evidence of availability from agreed-upon locations and intervals, and combine it with incident records to report monthly SLA performance.<\/li>\n<li><strong>How to do it in Dotcom-Monitor:<\/strong> Use the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/wiki\/knowledge-base-category\/sla-reports\/\"><strong>SLA Reporting<\/strong><\/a> You can set specific uptime and response time goals within the platform. Dotcom-Monitor can compute SLO attainment and a monitor-based \u2018<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/error-budget-calculator\/\"><strong>error budget<\/strong><\/a>\u2019 from your configured success criteria (e.g., check pass rate\/availability) over a chosen time window, and generate SLA-style reports based on those same definitions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you are defining these thresholds for the first time, our guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/sla-management-101-comment-creer-un-sla-de-performance-web-significatif\/\">SLA management 101<\/a> explains how to create meaningful web performance SLAs \u2014 including what to measure, what quality monitoring looks like, and how to structure reporting.<\/p>\n<h2 id='2-define-and-track-north-star-kpis'  id=\"boomdevs_2\">2. Define and Track North-Star KPIs<\/h2>\n<p>Raw metrics are only useful if they translate to user experience. Focus on analogous outside-in KPIs such as check\/transaction success rate and page\/step duration, and pair them with in-app telemetry when you need real traffic rate and server-side breakdowns.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Why it is important:<\/strong> KPIs filter out the &#8220;noise&#8221; of thousands of metrics, allowing engineers to focus on the indicators that directly impact user satisfaction and retention.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Outcome:<\/strong> A streamlined dashboard that gives an &#8220;at-a-glance&#8221; health check of the entire application ecosystem.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Example Use Case:<\/strong> A streaming platform tracks &#8220;Time to First Frame.&#8221; If this KPI exceeds 2 seconds, they know user churn will increase, regardless of whether the server is &#8220;up.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li><strong>How to do it in Dotcom-Monitor:<\/strong> Build <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/wiki\/knowledge-base\/dashboard-panel-editor\/\"><strong>Custom Dashboards<\/strong><\/a>. You can aggregate metrics like &#8220;Duration&#8221; (Response Time) and &#8220;Errors&#8221; (Percentage of failed checks) into a single pane of glass. Use the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/features\/reports\/\"><strong>Performance Reports<\/strong><\/a> to compare these KPIs across different browser types and versions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>These user-outcome metrics are the foundation of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/surveillance-de-lexperience-numerique-un-apercu\/\">digital experience monitoring<\/a> \u2014 our overview of DEM explains how it differs from traditional monitoring and why it is the right lens for SaaS performance management.<\/p>\n<h2 id='3-implement-continuous-24-7-global-monitoring'  id=\"boomdevs_3\">3. Implement Continuous 24\/7 Global Monitoring<\/h2>\n<p>Issues don&#8217;t only happen during office hours. Performance regressions can occur at any time due to deployments, resource exhaustion, or external dependencies. 24\/7 monitoring ensures these issues are detected immediately rather than discovered during business hours when user impact is already significant.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Why it is important:<\/strong> If you only monitor during peak hours or from your home office, you miss global routing issues, overnight deployments, or database cleanup tasks that slow down the site.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Outcome:<\/strong> The ability to catch &#8220;silent&#8221; regressions before they escalate into full-scale outages during peak traffic.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Example Use Case:<\/strong> A logistics company discovers that every night at 2:00 AM, their API latency spikes due to a backup script &#8211; affecting their international partners in different time zones.<\/li>\n<li><strong>How to do it in Dotcom-Monitor:<\/strong> Configure your devices to run on a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/frequence-de-la-surveillance-synthetique\/\"><strong>continuous frequency<\/strong><\/a> (as often as every minute). Ensure you are using the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/features\/monitoring-network\/\"><strong>Global Monitoring Network<\/strong><\/a> so that while your local team sleeps, our nodes are constantly verifying your application\u2019s health.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id='4-align-monitoring-with-the-devops-ci-cd-pipeline'  id=\"boomdevs_4\">4. Align Monitoring with the DevOps CI\/CD Pipeline<\/h2>\n<p>Monitoring must include production, but you can also \u2018shift left\u2019 by adding automated synthetic smoke tests and targeted performance regression checks in staging as part of CI\/CD &#8211; then validating continuously in production with outside-in monitors.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Why it is important:<\/strong> Catching a performance bottleneck in a staging environment is significantly cheaper and less risky than fixing it after it hits your entire user base.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Outcome:<\/strong> Increased deployment frequency and confidence, as every release is automatically vetted for performance regressions.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Example Use Case:<\/strong> A fintech team uses an automated script to trigger a Dotcom-Monitor test against their &#8220;Staging&#8221; environment immediately after a code merge. If the response time increases by more than 10%, the build is automatically flagged.<\/li>\n<li><strong>How to do it in Dotcom-Monitor:<\/strong> Integrate via the Dotcom-Monitor <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/products\/web-api-monitoring\/rest-api-monitoring\/\"><strong>REST API<\/strong><\/a>. You can programmatically start\/stop monitoring devices or trigger a LoadView stress test as part of your Jenkins, Azure DevOps, or GitHub Actions pipeline to validate how new code handles concurrent user loads before it is pushed to production.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id='5-prioritize-synthetic-transaction-monitoring-for-critical-paths'  id=\"boomdevs_5\">5. Prioritize Synthetic Transaction Monitoring for Critical Paths<\/h2>\n<p>While uptime checks tell you if your server is &#8220;on,&#8221; they don&#8217;t tell you if your users can actually &#8220;buy.&#8221; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/solutions\/synthetic-monitoring\/\"><strong>Synthetic<\/strong> <strong>monitoring<\/strong><\/a> simulates real user behavior to ensure core business logic remains functional.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Why it is important:<\/strong> HTTP 200 status codes only confirm successful page delivery, not functional completeness. Critical user flows may fail due to JavaScript errors, broken API endpoints, or client-side rendering issues that don&#8217;t affect the initial HTTP response.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Outcome:<\/strong> Continuous validation of revenue-generating flows (checkouts, logins, sign-ups) without waiting for real user traffic.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Example Use Case:<\/strong> An e-commerce site wants to ensure that the payment gateway is processing transactions every 5 minutes, even during low-traffic overnight hours.<\/li>\n<li><strong>How to do it in Dotcom-Monitor:<\/strong> Use the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/features\/everystep\/\"><strong>EveryStep Web Recorder<\/strong><\/a>. Record a baseline user journey (navigate\/click\/type) in 40+ desktop and mobile browsers, then refine the script with stable selectors and explicit waits so it runs deterministically on a schedule without flaking on dynamic UI behavior.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id='6-monitor-from-your-users-actual-geographic-locations'  id=\"boomdevs_6\">6. Monitor from Your Users\u2019 Actual Geographic Locations<\/h2>\n<p>Network latency is a physical reality. A fast-loading site in New York might be unusable in Singapore due to CDN misconfigurations or regional ISP issues.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Why it is important:<\/strong> Global performance variability can lead to &#8220;localized downtime&#8221; where your site is only accessible from certain parts of the world.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Outcome:<\/strong> A localized view of performance that helps identify regional bottlenecks and DNS propagation issues.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Example Use Case:<\/strong> A SaaS company with a large customer base in Europe notices high churn. Monitoring reveals that their London-based users experience 3x the latency of US-based users.<\/li>\n<li><strong>How to do it in Dotcom-Monitor:<\/strong> Leverage Dotcom-Monitor\u2019s 30+ global monitoring locations. When setting up a monitoring &#8220;Target,&#8221; select the specific geographic regions that match your user base to get a true representation of their experience.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id='7-implement-multi-layered-alerting-and-smart-escalation'  id=\"boomdevs_7\">7. Implement Multi-Layered Alerting and Smart Escalation<\/h2>\n<p>&#8220;Alert fatigue&#8221; is a leading cause of missed outages. If everything is an emergency, nothing is.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Why it is important:<\/strong> Flooding a DevOps engineer\u2019s Slack with low-priority notifications leads to them ignoring critical alerts.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Outcome:<\/strong> Faster Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR) because the right person is notified of the right problem at the right time.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Example Use Case:<\/strong> A minor CSS rendering issue triggers an email, but a full checkout failure triggers an automated phone call and a PagerDuty incident.<\/li>\n<li><strong>How to do it in Dotcom-Monitor:<\/strong> Configure <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/features\/alerts\/\"><strong>Alert Groups<\/strong><\/a> and Escalations. Set &#8220;Filters&#8221; so that an alert is only triggered after a failure is confirmed from at least two different global locations or persists for more than 3 minutes. Integrate these with Slack, PagerDuty, Webhook, Zapier, and OpsGenie.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id='8-baseline-performance-using-waterfall-charts-and-video-replays'  id=\"boomdevs_8\">8. Baseline Performance Using Waterfall Charts and Video Replays<\/h2>\n<p>Numbers like &#8220;5.2 seconds load time&#8221; lack context. You need to see <em>what<\/em> specifically is slowing down the page.565<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Why it is important:<\/strong> Modern web pages load hundreds of resources (scripts, images, third-party trackers). A third-party tag can significantly delay render or interactivity, especially if it\u2019s loaded synchronously or causes long main-thread tasks, making pages feel broken even when the HTML response is fast.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Outcome:<\/strong> Instant visual root-cause analysis without digging through raw logs.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Example Use Case:<\/strong> A marketing tag manager update causes a sudden 2-second delay. The waterfall chart clearly shows a specific script from a third-party vendor &#8220;hanging.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li><strong>How to do it in Dotcom-Monitor:<\/strong> Every failed (and successful) check in Dotcom-Monitor generates a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/wiki\/knowledge-base\/waterfall-chart\/\"><strong>detailed Waterfall Chart<\/strong><\/a>. For web application monitors, use the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/wiki\/knowledge-base\/video-recording\/\"><strong>Video Recording<\/strong><\/a> feature to watch a frame-by-frame replay of the error as it happened in the browser.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id='9-validate-content-with-assertions'  id=\"boomdevs_9\">9. Validate Content with Assertions<\/h2>\n<p>Just because a page loads doesn&#8217;t mean it\u2019s correct. &#8220;Zombie pages&#8221; (pages that load but show no content) are a common failure mode.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Why it is important:<\/strong> Applications can fail partially, displaying an empty white screen or an &#8220;internal error&#8221; message while still returning a successful HTTP 200 status.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Outcome:<\/strong> Assurance that the application is not only available but also functionally accurate.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Example Use Case:<\/strong> A database connection fails, so the search results page loads successfully but displays &#8220;0 results&#8221; for every query.<\/li>\n<li><strong>How to do it in Dotcom-Monitor:<\/strong> Add <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/wiki\/knowledge-base\/keywordassert\/\"><strong>Keyword Assertions<\/strong><\/a>. Within your monitoring setup, specify &#8220;Keyword Validation&#8221; to look for specific text (e.g., &#8220;Welcome, User&#8221; or &#8220;Order Summary&#8221;). If the text is missing, the monitor triggers an error.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id='10-monitor-api-dependencies-and-microservices'  id=\"boomdevs_10\">10. Monitor API Dependencies and Microservices<\/h2>\n<p>Many web apps depend heavily on backend APIs; when critical APIs fail, key user journeys can break or degrade. Pair frontend synthetic transactions with targeted API checks to isolate whether impact is in the UI layer, an API, or a downstream dependency.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Why it is important:<\/strong> Frontend monitoring alone can&#8217;t always pinpoint if a failure is in the UI layer or the backend API.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Outcome:<\/strong> Better outside-in coverage across UI and API layers, helping you narrow whether a slowdown is dominated by server response time (e.g., high TTFB) or client-side work, then confirm root cause with logs\/metrics\/traces.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Example Use Case:<\/strong> A mobile app stops displaying data because the authentication API is returning a 401 Unauthorized error due to an expired token.<\/li>\n<li><strong>How to do it in Dotcom-Monitor:<\/strong> Use <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/products\/web-api-monitoring\/\"><strong>Web API Monitoring<\/strong><\/a> to run multi-step SOAP or REST API calls. You can chain requests together, passing variables (like Auth Tokens) from one step to the next to simulate complex backend workflows.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For SaaS applications specifically, where APIs span authentication, billing, and feature modules, our guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/saas-monitoring-best-practices\/\">SaaS monitoring best practices<\/a> covers how to structure monitoring across all layers \u2014 not just the API.<\/p>\n<h2 id='11-regularly-audit-third-party-tag-impact'  id=\"boomdevs_11\">11. Regularly Audit Third-Party Tag Impact<\/h2>\n<p>Third-party scripts (ads, analytics, chatbots) are often the weakest link in web performance.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Why it is important:<\/strong> You don&#8217;t control the infrastructure of your third-party vendors. If their server goes down, your site\u2019s &#8220;Time to Interactive&#8221; can skyrocket.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Outcome:<\/strong> Better control over your site\u2019s performance budget and the ability to hold vendors accountable to their SLAs.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Example Use Case:<\/strong> After a holiday sale, you realize a &#8220;live chat&#8221; widget was responsible for 30% of your page load time.<\/li>\n<li><strong>How to do it in Dotcom-Monitor:<\/strong> Use the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/wiki\/knowledge-base\/filters\/\"><strong>Filter feature<\/strong><\/a> in your waterfall reports to isolate third-party domains. Dotcom-Monitor can also be configured to &#8220;Exclude&#8221; certain elements to test how much faster the site would be without them.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id='ensure-every-transaction-counts-with-dotcom-monitor'  id=\"boomdevs_12\">Ensure Every Transaction Counts with Dotcom-Monitor<\/h2>\n<p>Relying on customer complaints to find out your site is broken is a high-stakes gamble that most businesses lose. As the data shows, the cost of a single minute of downtime has reached staggering levels, and nearly 80% of your users won&#8217;t give you a second chance after a failed transaction. You need more than just a &#8220;green light&#8221; on a server &#8211; you need to know that your login, checkout, and critical paths are working for every user, in every corner of the globe, at every hour.<\/p>\n<div class=\"dcm_inblog_cta\">\n<p style=\"font-size: 22px;\">Explore all of these capabilities on our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/solutions\/saas-monitoring\/\">SaaS and web application monitoring platform<\/a> page and start your free trial today.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 22px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/guide-de-surveillance-des-transactions-web\/\">Monitor every step of your transactions<\/a> with Dotcom-Monitor\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/products\/web-application-monitoring\/\">Web Application Monitoring<\/a>. Simulate complex user journeys, catch regressions in staging, and get alerted the second a transaction fails &#8211; long before it impacts your bank account.<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"dcm_inblog_cta_button\" href=\"https:\/\/userauth.dotcom-monitor.com\/Account\/FreeTrialSignUp?SolutionType=Monitoring\">Start Your 30-Day Free Trial<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Master 11 web application monitoring best practices to reduce MTTR and boost reliability &#8211; from synthetic transactions to global monitoring with Dotcom-Monitor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39,"featured_media":33578,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3446],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33845","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-non-classifiee"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33845","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/39"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33845"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33845\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33578"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dotcom-monitor.com\/blog\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}